Andrew Constance

Very strongly agree

No

This aligns with the party's long-standing support for private sector management of infrastructure and the belief that government should not be in the business of running power companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, an inefficient government buyback will cost taxpayers billions without guaranteeing cheaper power

This captures the party's primary argument against buybacks: that they are a waste of taxpayer money and that the government is a less efficient manager of utilities than the private sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, we should increase free-market competition and strictly cap prices instead of reverting to state-ownership

This reflects the party's 'big stick' energy policy approach, which focuses on market competition and regulatory intervention (like the Default Market Offer) rather than state ownership. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only if independent modeling proves it will actually lower household power bills

Even with modeling, the Liberal Party typically opposes re-nationalization, preferring to address price issues through regulation and market competition rather than asset acquisition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Liberal Party is fundamentally committed to free-market principles and privatization, viewing state ownership as an inefficient way to manage electricity assets. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, essential utilities must be publicly owned to prioritize citizens over corporate profits

The party rejects the premise that public ownership is superior to private enterprise and views the rhetoric of 'prioritizing citizens over profits' as antithetical to their economic philosophy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.