+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 3.5k Grayndler voters.

88%
Yes
12%
No
77%
Yes
9%
No
8%
Yes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice
4%
No, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support
3%
Yes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.5k Grayndler voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 3.5k Grayndler voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Grayndler voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B2QDW8Wanswered…4wks4W

Yes, but only if it has been proven that the decision is being made by the patient themselves and not being coerced into making the decision by a family member &/or third party.

 @9WV4673answered…4mos4MO

I could write an essay - I think there needs to be appropriate assessments to determine eligibility IF it is to be something that is available

 @9W9Q2D8answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but only after a psychological examination has been conducted to show they understand their choice as well as the fact that they will not survive their illness.

 @9K2TWMDanswered…1yr1Y

yes, if there's no chance of surviving, they fully understand their choice, and dying would lead to a more painful death than assisted suicide

 @9JC8FRManswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but it should be an absolute final resort when all options are exhausted and the patient 100% confirms and consents.

 @9VMNYMZanswered…5mos5MO

it should depend on the person and there choices. for me it is wrong because ther is still a chance of recovery