+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 251 Protectionism voters.

49%
Yes
51%
No
49%
Yes
51%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 251 Protectionism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 251 Protectionism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Protectionism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZHR87Zanswered…1mo1MO

The question asks about artists, but the reporting should be on art related corporations. They have enough corporate structure and documents to be audited and regulated. This should not be used to bug smaller independent artists, those are covered by income tax laws.

 @9ZFCJX4answered…1mo1MO

Depending on how much the artist is making save the hedge funds making $34 billion and the artist is only making $500 there's a big difference on regulatory standards for reporting and summarising an income statement for the ATO or any government agencies that want to know so depending on what the artist is making no

 @9W7FMBVanswered…2mos2MO

Depending on how they made their art and what inspired it, it could be the right thing to do, but if their is such little to nitpick on then theirs no point.

 @9VPTBW3answered…2mos2MO

If selling actual traditional artwork - no but if they are artists selling digital art or nfts then yes definitely

 @9V9SVTXanswered…3mos3MO

Only if the regulator has the same ability and desire to regulate and enforce these requirements as the financial regulator.

 @9V64KJ3answered…3mos3MO

Based on value as in any artists work below say 1000 would be free of this burden.

 @9V4RPLJanswered…3mos3MO

No, but There should be an accessible way for an artist to register their art in a database that has similar fraud detection as currency.