Smart transportation infrastructure uses advanced technology, such as smart traffic lights and connected vehicles, to improve traffic flow and safety. Proponents argue that it enhances efficiency, reduces congestion, and improves safety through better technology. Opponents argue that it is costly, may face technical challenges, and requires significant maintenance and upgrades.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Ideology
Response rates from 525 Left voters.
88% Yes |
12% No |
88% Yes |
12% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 525 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 525 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B2PN3XB2mos2MO
No, use that money for public transportation instead.
@B2CRG6D3mos3MO
No. Invest in Having fast safe driverless metro systems in Australian cities to reduce congestion and need to buy car. Sydney metro is great but finish it by 2035 not 2056
@9SYC4SQ7mos7MO
If you wanna have less congestion, have less cars! Only smart AND environmentally friendly public transportation which has been rigorously tested like solar trams or whatever.
@9P4BD2L10mos10MO
No, these are typically gadgetbahns and despite appearances are less effective than traditional methods of mass transit.
@9QYFR269mos9MO
It should be trialled on a smaller scale in individual suburbs or small cities, before being rolled out on a larger scale.
@9QYDNKN9mos9MO
No, invest in proven technology instead of gadgetbahns.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
