+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 3.1k 5000 voters.

21%
Yes
79%
No
17%
Yes
62%
No
2%
Yes, but not in heavily populated areas
13%
No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
2%
Yes, but increase oversight
4%
No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.1k 5000 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 3.1k 5000 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from 5000 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B38RCK7answered…1wk1W

Yes, taxed at a much higher rate for an Australian Sovereign Fund and money used for renewable energy investment

 @B24STGSanswered…3mos3MO

No, pursuing fracking when we are trying to reduce our carbon footprints would be contradictory to that goal.

 @9ZNMKQBanswered…4mos4MO

It is okay, although oversight should be increased, but these resources should regardless be replaced by sustainable sources such as nuclear.

 @9LXVFS8answered…10mos10MO

No, firstly, more research is needed to measure the long-term effects of fracking and we should pursue more suitable energy resources instead.

 @8Z3HNHVanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes it should be done, but it must be highly regulated and not done in a public environment. More use of solar farms is applicable.