Statistics are shown for this demographic
Local Government Area
Response rates from 2.4k Griffith voters.
43% Yes |
57% No |
29% Yes |
57% No |
13% Yes, but not for cosmetics |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.4k Griffith voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 2.4k Griffith voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Griffith voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9MYFHGP10mos10MO
No, animals react differently to humans on most medications so not only is it unethical to the animal, it's ineffective for the human.
@8RLTJCF4yrs4Y
Yes but only rats or mice
@9F9VNPV2yrs2Y
Yes, so long as there is no harm done to the animals that the tests are being done to.
@997LC632yrs2Y
No, unless there are no viable alternatives
@B3Y8Q6D 1 day1D
Yes but there should be strict regulation and transparency on the treatment of animals used for animal testing
@B3VYT56 4 days4D
Only if circumstances require for potential life saving treatment and no alternative method is suitable
@B3S5GRB7 days7D
People who commit charges such as murder (not in self defence), and child molestation charges should be used instead.
@934XZ333yrs3Y
Only when they are at least 85% confident it will work and never for cosmetic’s
Join in on the most popular conversations.
