+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 548 Science Party voters.

16%
Yes
84%
No
7%
Yes
78%
No
5%
Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler
6%
No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy
3%
Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests
1%
Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 548 Science Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 548 Science Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Science Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B24STGSanswered…2mos2MO

No, whilst it may not result in outcomes we approve of, we should only respond to any outcomes they produce, not the introductions.

 @9ZTPDVManswered…2mos2MO

No, we shouldn't tamper in foreign elections, even if an outcome is achievable and beneficial to us.

 @9SSM8PBfrom Guam  answered…5mos5MO

with New Zealand and Fijian people and other Maui islands that are small and close to Australia should be able to

 @9MYFHGPanswered…8mos8MO

No, that's called imperialism. And for being the so-called "leader of the free world", they've been very supportive of right-wing dictators getting into power through us-backed coup d'etats like in Iran in 1953, Chile in 1973 and like they attempted in Cuba in the bay of Pigs invasion, among too many to list individually.

 @9LYPL7Kanswered…9mos9MO

Yes, to support a stable relationship with our country we should try to promote pro-Australian governments.

 @8P5XPD9answered…4yrs4Y

Only diplomatically, I think we should be free to publicly express our stance on Human Rights or the effectiveness of the process, anything beyond this is subversion and should be criminal.