+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 3.2k Right voters.

62%
Yes
38%
No
53%
Yes
36%
No
5%
Yes, unless they have committed a crime
2%
No, and we should not allow any new immigrants into the country at this time
2%
Yes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism
1%
No, and revoke the status for those currently holding dual citizenship
1%
Yes, but they should not be able to claim citizenship status of more than two nations

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.2k Right voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 3.2k Right voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Right voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B3BLDFManswered…1wk1W

Only in the event that they’re working in a crucial work sector, such as healthcare, engineering, etc.

 @B374RC4answered…2wks2W

Make it more desirable to become a citizen instead of giving the same benefits to PR. If Australia decided to make it a one citizenship nation, I wouldn't care.

 @B33C8S4answered…3wks3W

No, but allow an exemption of the citizen is unable (eg North Korean citizen) or at severe personal disadvantage (eg must care for sick overseas family member)

 @B2SXP9Sanswered…4wks4W

Yes, and there should be re-consideration about rewording Section 44 to allow dual citizens to become MPs.

 @B2HZNL3answered…1mo1MO

Yes, but only for the country they were born in and for the country they are planning to live in permanently.

 @B24STGSanswered…3mos3MO

Yes, and allow them to serve in parliament provided they do not hold citizenship of a nation that could be considered a threat to national security.

 @9WNJ2H2from Virginia  answered…4mos4MO

Yes for peaceful countries. No to countries that are constantly at war such as South Africa, Middle Eastern countries etc. They can still visit their home countries on an Australian citizenship/passport if they need to.