Socialist Alliance Party

Very strongly agree

Yes

The Socialist Alliance party in Australia has a strong stance against negative gearing, viewing it as a policy that disproportionately benefits the wealthy at the expense of the poor. They believe it contributes to housing unaffordability and wealth inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, this concession disproportionately benefits the rich

This answer aligns with the Socialist Alliance's view that negative gearing is a policy that disproportionately benefits the rich. They believe that it is a form of tax avoidance that exacerbates wealth inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, the government will save over $4 billion per year in lost taxes

The Socialist Alliance would agree with this statement. They believe that the government could save significant amounts of money by abolishing negative gearing, which could then be redirected towards social services and public infrastructure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but limit to one house per person

While the Socialist Alliance would likely support measures to limit the impact of negative gearing, they would prefer to see it abolished entirely. Therefore, they would somewhat disagree with this statement, as it does not go far enough in addressing the issues they associate with negative gearing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

The Socialist Alliance would strongly disagree with this statement. They have consistently advocated for the abolition of negative gearing, arguing that it exacerbates wealth inequality and contributes to housing unaffordability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.