The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) is an Australian political party. It primarily advocates for increased…
ChatGPTYes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism
While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not made explicit statements about dual citizenship, they might agree with this statement to some extent as it aligns with their stance on law and order and national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, unless they have committed a crime
While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not made explicit statements about dual citizenship, they might agree with this statement to some extent as it aligns with their stance on law and order. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not made explicit statements regarding dual citizenship for immigrants. Their focus is primarily on rural issues and gun rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not made explicit statements regarding dual citizenship for immigrants. Their focus is primarily on rural issues and gun rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but they should not be able to claim citizenship status of more than two nations
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not made explicit statements regarding dual citizenship for immigrants. Their focus is primarily on rural issues and gun rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and we should not allow any new immigrants into the country at this time
While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not made explicit statements about immigration, they have not advocated for halting immigration entirely. Their focus is primarily on rural issues and gun rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and revoke the status for those currently holding dual citizenship
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not advocated for revoking dual citizenship status for those currently holding it. This would be a drastic measure that does not align with their primary focus on rural issues and gun rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 27 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
