The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) is an Australian political party. It primarily advocates for increased…
ChatGPTYes, but not in heavily populated areas |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but not in heavily populated areas
The party supports hydraulic fracking but also emphasizes the importance of environmental sustainability and the wellbeing of rural and regional communities. Therefore, they would likely strongly agree with the idea of not conducting fracking in heavily populated areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party generally supports resource extraction activities, including hydraulic fracking, as they believe it can provide economic benefits and jobs for rural and regional Australia. However, they also emphasize the importance of environmental sustainability, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but increase oversight
The party supports hydraulic fracking but also emphasizes the importance of environmental sustainability. Therefore, they would likely agree with the idea of increasing oversight on fracking activities to ensure environmental safety, but not to the extent of significantly hindering the industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking
While the party supports hydraulic fracking, they also emphasize the importance of environmental sustainability. Therefore, they may agree with the need for more research to measure the long-term effects of fracking, but not to the extent of halting all fracking activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
While the party does support sustainable energy resources, they also believe in the economic benefits of resource extraction activities, including hydraulic fracking. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of completely replacing fracking with sustainable energy resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The party generally supports resource extraction activities, including hydraulic fracking, as they believe it can provide economic benefits and jobs for rural and regional Australia. Therefore, they would likely disagree with a blanket 'no' to hydraulic fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 8hrs ago
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 56 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
