The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) is an Australian political party. It primarily advocates for increased…
ChatGPTYes, but not for cosmetics |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, but not for cosmetics
While the SFF party has not made explicit statements about animal testing, it is plausible that they would support a more moderate position that allows for animal testing in medical research but not for cosmetics. This is based on the assumption that they may differentiate between the use of animals for essential human health benefits versus non-essential purposes like cosmetics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) has not made explicit statements about animal testing for medical purposes. However, given their general support for hunting and fishing activities, it can be inferred that they may not be strongly opposed to the use of animals in research for the advancement of human health. Their score is not higher because of the lack of explicit policy or statement on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The SFF party has not shown a strong stance against the use of animals in contexts that benefit humans, such as hunting and fishing. Therefore, it is unlikely that they would strongly support a complete ban on animal testing, especially when it comes to testing drugs, vaccines, and medical devices that could potentially save human lives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 11hrs ago
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 504 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
