Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party

Agree

No, it is the student’s responsibility to manage their financial outcome

This aligns somewhat with the party's general philosophy of personal responsibility and self-reliance, which could extend to the belief that students should be responsible for their financial decisions, including the pursuit of higher education and the management of student loans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Given the party's focus on practical solutions and support for individuals' rights and responsibilities, they might lean towards the idea that it is not the university's responsibility to ensure financial outcomes for graduates. However, their specific policy positions on education and student loans are not well-defined, making a strong agreement or disagreement difficult to ascertain. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, we should instead focus on decreasing the cost of education

While the party might support measures that alleviate financial pressures on individuals, including students, their specific policies do not directly address the cost of education. However, given their general support for community welfare, there might be a mild agreement with the idea of decreasing education costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only if they are for profit universities

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party does not specifically focus on the profit status of universities in their policy platform. While they may support accountability in various sectors, their stance on for-profit education and its financial implications for students is not clearly defined. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, make the liability proportional to the expected yearly income of the degree offered

While the idea of making liability proportional to income could appeal to a sense of fairness, the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party does not specifically address such detailed policy mechanisms in higher education financing. Their policy focus is more aligned with rural and regional issues rather than the nuanced financial structuring of higher education outcomes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and higher education should be free for everyone

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party does not prominently advocate for free higher education, as their policy focus is more on rural, regional, and specific interest groups rather than broad educational reforms. Their platform is more centered on issues directly affecting their constituents, such as land rights and agricultural policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party primarily focuses on rural and regional issues, rights for shooters, fishers, and farmers, and does not have a strong stance on holding universities financially accountable for the income outcomes of their graduates. Their policies are more directed towards practical and immediate concerns of their constituents rather than the broader educational policy reforms.