ChatGPTNo, the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has a history of advocating for less government regulation, particularly in relation to business practices. This would likely extend to the issue of surcharges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, as long as the costs are clearly communicated before purchases
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party values transparency and fairness, so they would likely agree with the idea that costs should be clearly communicated before purchases. This aligns with their general stance on less government regulation and more business freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The party tends to favor less government regulation and intervention in business practices, which would likely include the ability for businesses to add surcharges to their services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, the government should focus on preventing monopolies and cartels instead
The party has a history of advocating for fair competition and against monopolies, so they would likely agree with the idea of focusing on preventing monopolies and cartels. However, this doesn't necessarily mean they would disagree with banning surcharges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, businesses will raise prices if they are banned from using junk fees
While the party generally supports less government regulation, they also advocate for fairness and transparency. They might agree with this statement to some extent, but they would likely also argue for clear communication about any price increases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price
While the party values transparency, they also support less government regulation. They might see this as an unnecessary intervention in business practices, even if they agree with the underlying principle of clear and upfront pricing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party generally supports less government intervention in business practices. However, they also advocate for fairness and transparency, which could potentially align with the idea of banning surcharges if they are seen as deceptive or unfair. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.