Try the political quiz

Science’s policy on government surveillance

Topics

Should the government be able to monitor phone calls and emails?

  Public statementsYes, but only by court order

Science’s answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

Answer: Yes, but only by court order

Reference: “Law enforcement agencies must apply for and receive a warrant to investigate online behaviour. There shall be no requirement for...” ‐org.au

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications

The Science Party has a strong stance on protecting digital rights and privacy. They have opposed legislation that would increase government surveillance powers, and have advocated for laws that protect citizens from unwarranted surveillance. Therefore, they would likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Science Party's policy platform includes a commitment to digital rights and privacy. They have previously opposed legislation that would increase government surveillance powers, suggesting they would agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only by court order

The Science Party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their belief in the importance of legal processes and checks and balances. They have advocated for laws that protect citizens from unwarranted surveillance, and a court order requirement would be in line with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds

The Science Party might somewhat agree with this statement as they believe in a balance between security and privacy. However, they would likely insist on strict regulations and oversight to prevent misuse of such powers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism

While the Science Party acknowledges the importance of national security, they have expressed concerns about the potential for government overreach and the erosion of civil liberties. They would likely disagree with this statement, believing that there are other ways to combat terrorism without infringing on privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Science Party of Australia is a strong advocate for privacy rights and digital rights. They believe in the importance of protecting individual privacy and have expressed concerns about government surveillance. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the unrestricted monitoring of phone calls and emails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Science’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.