The Science Party believes that technological development is a positive force in human affairs and values the cultural,…
Public statementsYes, but only by court order |
Science’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes, but only by court order
Reference: “Law enforcement agencies must apply for and receive a warrant to investigate online behaviour. There shall be no requirement for...” ‐org.au
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
The Science Party has a strong stance on protecting digital rights and privacy. They have opposed legislation that would increase government surveillance powers, and have advocated for laws that protect citizens from unwarranted surveillance. Therefore, they would likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The Science Party's policy platform includes a commitment to digital rights and privacy. They have previously opposed legislation that would increase government surveillance powers, suggesting they would agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only by court order
The Science Party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their belief in the importance of legal processes and checks and balances. They have advocated for laws that protect citizens from unwarranted surveillance, and a court order requirement would be in line with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
The Science Party might somewhat agree with this statement as they believe in a balance between security and privacy. However, they would likely insist on strict regulations and oversight to prevent misuse of such powers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
While the Science Party acknowledges the importance of national security, they have expressed concerns about the potential for government overreach and the erosion of civil liberties. They would likely disagree with this statement, believing that there are other ways to combat terrorism without infringing on privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Science Party of Australia is a strong advocate for privacy rights and digital rights. They believe in the importance of protecting individual privacy and have expressed concerns about government surveillance. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the unrestricted monitoring of phone calls and emails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Science’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.