Reason Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

The Reason Party's strong stance on human rights and ethical governance suggests they would be highly supportive of banning all sales to countries with human rights violations. This position aligns with their advocacy for policies that promote human rights and ethical international relations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Reason Party, with its focus on human rights, evidence-based policy, and ethical governance, would likely agree with imposing restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations. This stance aligns with their broader commitment to human rights and international law. However, the absence of a specific policy on arms sales in their publicly available documents means the agreement might not be absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While the Reason Party is committed to human rights and ethical policy-making, their specific views on foreign policy, including military aid, are not clearly defined in their public documents. They might support restrictions based on human rights concerns but advocating for a total ban on all military aid to any foreign countries might not align perfectly with their known stances, as they might consider the nuances of international relations and defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the Reason Party's emphasis on human rights and ethical policy-making, it is unlikely they would support the absence of restrictions on arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. Their platform, which prioritizes human rights, suggests a strong disagreement with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

The Reason Party's commitment to human rights and ethical governance would likely make them strongly disagree with the notion of not restricting arms sales, even to allies, if those allies are accused of human rights violations. This stance would be inconsistent with their emphasis on human rights and ethical international relations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.