One Nation Party

Strongly agree

No

One Nation has not advocated for banning negative gearing. Their policies generally favor individual financial freedom and property rights, which would be consistent with allowing negative gearing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but limit to one house per person

While One Nation has not specifically proposed this policy, it could potentially align with their concerns about wealth inequality and their support for individual financial freedom and property rights. Limiting negative gearing to one house per person could be seen as a compromise between these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, the government will save over $4 billion per year in lost taxes

One Nation has not explicitly supported a ban on negative gearing for the purpose of increasing government revenue. While they have expressed concerns about government spending, they have not specifically targeted negative gearing as a source of lost tax revenue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this concession disproportionately benefits the rich

While One Nation has expressed concerns about wealth inequality, they have not specifically targeted negative gearing as a cause. Their policies generally favor individual financial freedom and property rights, which would be inconsistent with a ban on negative gearing based on its benefits to the rich. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

One Nation has not explicitly called for a ban on negative gearing. They have generally supported policies that favor individual financial freedom and property rights, which would be inconsistent with a complete ban on negative gearing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.