One Nation Party

Agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

This answer aligns most closely with One Nation's overarching priorities of national security and protecting Australia's interests. The party has consistently emphasized the importance of security and sovereignty, suggesting they would support whistleblower protections if they do not compromise national security. This stance allows for a balance between transparency and security, fitting within One Nation's policy framework. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

One Nation's policies and statements often emphasize legality and the rule of law, particularly in the context of national security and immigration. This suggests they might support whistleblower protections if the information was obtained legally, aligning with their law-and-order stance. However, their support might be conditional, reflecting concerns over legality and the potential impact on national security or social cohesion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

While not explicitly stated in their policies, One Nation's strong emphasis on national security and law and order suggests a potential reluctance to fully support whistleblower protections that could, in their view, undermine these priorities. However, this score is not strongly positive because there is no clear, direct policy statement from One Nation explicitly opposing whistleblower protections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, but reduce their sentences

There is limited information on One Nation's specific stance on reducing sentences for whistleblowers. Their general approach to law and order suggests a nuanced view might be possible, where whistleblowers could be seen under a more lenient lens if their actions align with One Nation's broader nationalistic and security-focused agenda. However, without explicit policy statements, this remains speculative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

One Nation Party, led by Pauline Hanson, has often emphasized national security, social cohesion, and a strong stance against what it perceives as external threats to Australian society. Their policies do not explicitly address whistleblower protections, and their general approach suggests a cautious stance towards actions that could disrupt existing structures or security measures. Therefore, they might not fully support broad laws protecting whistleblowers without conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.