Liberal National Party

Strongly agree

No

The Liberal National Party has consistently opposed proposals to ban negative gearing. They argue that it is an important tool for encouraging investment in the housing market and supporting economic growth. For instance, during the 2016 federal election, they campaigned against Labor's proposal to limit negative gearing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but limit to one house per person

While the Liberal National Party has generally opposed restrictions on negative gearing, they might be more open to the idea of limiting it to one house per person as a compromise. However, there is no specific historical precedent for this position, so the score is only slightly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, the government will save over $4 billion per year in lost taxes

While the Liberal National Party might acknowledge the potential for savings in lost taxes, they have traditionally argued that the benefits of negative gearing in terms of encouraging investment and supporting the housing market outweigh the costs. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this argument for banning negative gearing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Liberal National Party has traditionally supported negative gearing as a way to encourage investment in the housing market. They have argued that it helps to increase the supply of rental properties and keep rents affordable. For example, in the 2016 federal election, the party campaigned against Labor's proposal to limit negative gearing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, this concession disproportionately benefits the rich

The Liberal National Party has generally rejected the argument that negative gearing disproportionately benefits the rich. They argue that many middle-income earners also use negative gearing to invest in property and build wealth. For example, during the 2016 federal election, they argued that Labor's proposal to limit negative gearing would hurt 'mum and dad investors'. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.