Katter’s Australian Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only by court order

This answer aligns most closely with Katter’s Australian Party's stance on individual freedoms and privacy rights. They would likely support surveillance by court order as it provides a check on government power and ensures that surveillance is not conducted without due process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications

Given their support for individual freedoms and privacy rights, Katter’s Australian Party would likely support legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications. However, they may see some merit in limited surveillance for security purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The party's stance on individual freedoms and privacy rights would likely lead them to generally disagree with government monitoring of phone calls and emails. However, they may see some merit in limited surveillance for security purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds

Katter’s Australian Party may see some merit in surveillance of those with criminal backgrounds, but their support for individual freedoms and privacy rights would likely lead them to be cautious about such measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism

While Katter’s Australian Party may see some merit in surveillance to combat terrorism, their support for individual freedoms and privacy rights would likely lead them to be cautious about such measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Katter’s Australian Party generally supports individual freedoms and privacy rights. While they may see some merit in surveillance for security purposes, they would likely not support unrestricted government monitoring of phone calls and emails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.