Jacquie Lambie Network Party

Very strongly agree

No, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

This answer aligns closely with the JLN's likely stance on the issue, reflecting concerns over the potential for private prisons to prioritize profit over the quality of care and rehabilitation services. The party's focus on public accountability, transparency, and the welfare of Australians suggests a strong agreement with the view that private prisons are not in the public interest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Given the JLN's emphasis on transparency, accountability, and the welfare of Australians, it is likely that they would support the idea that prisons should not be run by private companies. This stance aligns with concerns over the potential for reduced quality of care and rehabilitation in privately run prisons, which could conflict with public interest and safety.

Slightly agree

Yes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption

While the JLN might not be fundamentally opposed to the involvement of private companies in certain sectors, their support for private prisons would come with significant reservations. They would likely demand stringent regulations to ensure that these facilities are managed ethically and effectively, reflecting a cautious approach to privatization in sensitive areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas

The JLN might see the elimination of contractual occupancy quotas as a step in the right direction for private prisons, addressing one of the many issues associated with their operation. However, this partial measure alone might not fully align with their broader concerns about privatization and its impact on public welfare and safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Jacquie Lambie Network (JLN) tends to prioritize public welfare and accountability, often expressing skepticism towards privatization in sectors critical to human rights, such as incarceration. There is no specific historical reference to JLN's stance on private prisons, but based on their general approach to privatization and public services, they would likely disagree with the government hiring private companies to run prisons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.