Great Australian Party

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The Great Australian Party would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus to decrease misinformation patients receive. This aligns with their general support for policies that protect public health. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Great Australian Party may somewhat agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as they generally support policies that protect public health. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The Great Australian Party may somewhat agree with not penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as long as they disclose this information to patients. This stance balances the need for transparency and the potential for scientific consensus to change. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

The Great Australian Party may slightly agree with penalizing doctors and revoking their medical licenses for giving health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus. However, this stance may be seen as too harsh, and there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The Great Australian Party may be neutral on only penalizing doctors when their advice was proven to harm the patient. They may see the importance of protecting public health but also recognize the potential for scientific consensus to change. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The Great Australian Party may slightly disagree with not penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, even if scientific consensus can change quickly. They may believe that doctors should still adhere to current best practices to protect public health. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Great Australian Party would likely disagree with not penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as they generally support policies that protect public health. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.