David Pocock Party

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

Requiring disclosure that advice contradicts scientific consensus might be seen by the David Pocock Party as a reasonable compromise that respects patient autonomy, encourages informed decision-making, and maintains a commitment to evidence-based practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

Reducing misinformation is likely a goal aligned with the David Pocock Party's values, given their probable support for evidence-based policy and public health. However, the party might also consider the nuances of medical practice and the evolving nature of scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

The David Pocock Party, being a centrist and potentially focusing on evidence-based policy, might somewhat agree with penalizing doctors who contradict scientific consensus to maintain public health standards. However, the party's stance on individual freedoms and the complexity of medical science might temper their agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The party might agree that penalizing doctors should be a measure of last resort, used only when their advice has caused harm. This stance would reflect a balanced approach to maintaining public health while respecting the complexities of medical practice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

This answer reflects a balance between innovation in medical science and patient safety, a balance the David Pocock Party might appreciate. However, without specific policy positions from the party on such matters, it's challenging to predict their stance accurately. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Given the party's likely emphasis on evidence-based approaches, they would probably disagree with allowing doctors to freely give advice that contradicts scientific consensus. However, they might also value the importance of diverse opinions and the evolution of scientific understanding, leading to a mild disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

The David Pocock Party, focusing on moderate and balanced policies, would likely view the revocation of medical licenses as too extreme for simply giving advice that contradicts current consensus, considering the potential for scientific evolution and the importance of clinical judgement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.