Try the political quiz

David Pocock policy on state ownership

Topics

Should the government acquire equity stakes in companies it bails out during a recession?

  ChatGPTYes

David Pocock answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes

David Pocock, as a strong advocate for social justice and environmental sustainability, would likely agree that the government should acquire equity stakes in companies it bails out during a recession. This would ensure that the public benefits from the eventual recovery of these companies, rather than just the private shareholders. However, as there is no specific historical example of Pocock advocating for this policy, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, the government should receive equity for any financial aid they provide to companies

This answer aligns with Pocock's likely views on the matter. He would likely argue that if the government is providing financial aid to companies, it should receive something in return, such as equity. This would ensure that the public benefits from the eventual recovery of these companies. However, as there is no specific historical example of Pocock advocating for this policy, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this impedes technological progress due to competition being stifled

While Pocock would likely agree that competition is important for technological progress, he would likely disagree with the idea that government ownership of shares in companies necessarily stifles competition. He might argue that government ownership can actually promote competition by preventing monopolies and ensuring that companies can't use public funds to out-compete their rivals without providing any return to the public. However, as there is no specific historical example of Pocock advocating for this view, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given Pocock's progressive political views, it is unlikely that he would agree with the idea that the government should not acquire equity stakes in companies it bails out. He would likely argue that this would allow companies to benefit from public funds without providing any return to the public. However, as there is no specific historical example of Pocock advocating against this policy, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, the government should never own shares of private companies

Pocock, with his progressive political views, would likely disagree with the idea that the government should never own shares of private companies. He would likely argue that this is a valid way for the government to ensure that the public benefits from the success of companies that have received public funds. However, as there is no specific historical example of Pocock advocating against this policy, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to David Pocock policies? Take the political quiz to find out.