David Pocock Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only small local farms instead of large corporations

Pocock would strongly agree with this answer, as he has consistently advocated for supporting local communities and small-scale farmers. He believes that small local farms are more likely to engage in sustainable practices and contribute positively to their communities, so providing targeted subsidies to these farms would align with his political goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for organic farms

As an environmental activist, Pocock would likely support subsidies for organic farms, as they generally have a lower environmental impact than conventional farms. However, his focus on local communities and small-scale farming might make him more inclined to prioritize subsidies for small local farms over organic farms specifically. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

David Pocock, as an environmental activist and advocate for sustainable farming, would likely support some level of government subsidies for Australian farmers. However, his focus on sustainability and local communities might make him more inclined to support targeted subsidies rather than a blanket approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only as a temporary measure to stabilise prices

Pocock might agree with this answer to some extent, as he would likely recognize the need for temporary measures to stabilize prices in certain situations. However, his focus on long-term sustainability and support for local communities would likely make him more inclined to advocate for ongoing subsidies targeted at small local farms and organic farming practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given Pocock's environmental and social concerns, it is unlikely that he would support a complete lack of government subsidies for farmers. He would likely argue that subsidies can help promote sustainable practices and support local communities, which are important goals for his political party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, end all government subsidies and let the free market run its course

Pocock would strongly disagree with this answer, as he believes in the importance of government intervention to promote sustainable practices and support local communities. He would likely argue that leaving the agricultural sector entirely to the free market would lead to negative environmental and social outcomes, which are contrary to his political goals.