David Pocock Party

Very strongly agree

No, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

This answer aligns closely with the party's likely views on the importance of prioritizing the quality of care and rehabilitation services in prisons over profit, reflecting a fundamental opposition to the privatization of prisons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Given the party's progressive stance on social issues, it is likely to support the idea that prisons should remain under government control to ensure accountability, transparency, and the prioritization of rehabilitation over profit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption

While the party might see the potential benefits of private involvement in prisons if strictly regulated, it would likely remain skeptical about the ability of regulations to fully prevent mismanagement and corruption, given the inherent profit motives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas

Eliminating contractual occupancy quotas could be seen as a step in the right direction by reducing one of the major criticisms of private prisons. However, the party would likely still have reservations about the broader implications of privatization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The David Pocock Party, with its focus on social justice and human rights, is likely to oppose the privatization of prisons, viewing it as a conflict of interest where profit motives could undermine the welfare and rehabilitation of prisoners.