@4YYWWRC

4>4  個人的な答え妊娠中絶に賛成である

4>4  個人的な答えはい

4>4  個人的な答えMarriage should be between any two adult people who want to legally bind their love for each other. No religious or government entity should have any right to make that decision for any couple unless it is incest!

4>4  個人的な答えはい、私たちのメンタルヘルスケアシステムは、ケアやサービスの高品質を提供するために、より多くの資金を必要とします

4>4  個人的な答えはい。そして、代替エネルギーの生産をもっと優遇すべき。

4>4  個人的な答えYes, but only in the safety of the general public. A court order should be sought to monitor known criminals and associates. Any suspect or associate of terrorism should absolutely be monitored without a court order to ensure every effort is made to prevent any act of terror occurring. If monitoring of anyone shows nothing suspicious, any information obtained during the time of monitoring should kept absolutely confidential.

4>4  個人的な答えYes, it should be recognised that they were the original land occupiers of Australia. It should not go to a referendum.

4>4  個人的な答えはい。でも、患者が病気から生還できる可能性がない場合に限る

4>4  個人的な答え所得税率を下げ、大企業の税金の抜け道をすべてなくす

4>4  個人的な答えはい

4>4  個人的な答えはい

4>4  個人的な答えいいえ

4>4  個人的な答えYes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

4>4  個人的な答えはい、そしてそれを生活賃金にします

4>4  個人的な答えはい

4>4  個人的な答えIt is ironic that the average working Registered Nurse working in a private hospital can not afford private health insurance to receive care that is provided by that nurse. Healthcare services need to be accessible by everyone even if it means increased taxes for that purpose. The healthcare system must be forward moving only.

4>4  個人的な答えはい

4>4  個人的な答えWho ever is most suitable for the position should have the position, a persons gender is irrelevant!

4>4  個人的な答えはい、しかしすべての市民を対象に税制優遇措置という名目にすべきです

4>4  個人的な答えはい

4>4  個人的な答えはい

4>4  個人的な答えいいえ

4>4  個人的な答えはい、男性と同様の身体的試験に合格できる場合には

4>4  個人的な答えはい、雇用主や政治家を含む、政府から補助金を受け取っているすべての人を調査すべきです

4>4  個人的な答えいいえ、戻って海に船を回し、ハードセキュリティチェックと一時保護ビザでオフショアそれらを処理

4>4  個人的な答え多国籍大企業に向けては引き上げし、小企業に向けては引き下げ

4>4  個人的な答えはい、しかし、環境規制や監督を高めます

4>4  個人的な答えいいえ

4>4  個人的な答えOnly for those who will truly benefit from use of it, ie terminally ill people. There is too much evidence associating marijuana with psychosis and long term ill mental health

4>4  個人的な答えはい

4>4  個人的な答えいいえ

4>4  個人的な答え減少させるべき。そして、政府は自国の市民がこうした仕事につけるよう、もっと優遇すべき。

4>4  個人的な答えIt should only be developed if it will benefit Australia as a whole. It needs to be regulated and should not be privatised.

4>4  個人的な答えはい

4>4  個人的な答えYes. Any saving should go toward lessening the government's financial deficit, public education and anything that will ultimately benefit the future of Australia. Banning negative gearing may lessen the want for people to lease out investment properties and possibly allow more first time home buyers into the market of home ownership. Foreign ownership of housing should also be eradicated.

4>4  個人的な答えはい、動物虐待の法律を施行する国への輸出を許可

4>4  個人的な答えいいえ、しかし、おそらく後には手頃な価格だとき

4>4  個人的な答え助けになる。しかし、政治献金ができないように禁止すべき。

4>4  個人的な答えいいえ、代わりに多国籍大企業に対する税金を上げるべきです。

4>4  個人的な答えいいえ、ちょうどオーストラリアの海域で日本の捕鯨を防ぎます

4>4  個人的な答えはい、でも大企業ではなく地元の小さな農家だけ

4>4  個人的な答えはい

4>4  個人的な答えI don't know. I have a well paying job and can pay my bills fine, but can not yet get into the housing market as a 10% deposit minimum requirement equates to approximately my annual income. The Australian dream for the average middle class Australian is becoming harder and harder. The average land sizes in metropolitan Adelaide are ridiculous. I'm 30 now and grew up with about 500 square meters of yard to play in only 5 minutes drive out of the heart of the city of Adelaide. My children won't have a court yard to play in 30+ minutes drive out of the city.

4>4  個人的な答えThe pension is means tested for retirees, what makes a retired government worker any different not to mention politicians who too should be means tested for any benefit at any point in their career and life.

4>4  個人的な答えHospitals need to run #1 to benefit the patient and #2 to benefit its workers.

4>4  個人的な答え引き上げるべき。ただし、国債が大幅に削減された後にのみ。

4>4  個人的な答えYes, as long as offshore income is reported and harsh penalties are enforced for anyone who deliberately evade taxes.

4>4  個人的な答え国家予算の赤字の大部分が解消するまで減らすべき

4>4  個人的な答えいいえ

4>4  個人的な答えいいえ

4>4  個人的な答えOur school students are the future of this country. It's frustrating that they aren't extreme priority. Regardless of who provides the funding, it needs to be distributed fairly to equally benefit students even if it's on a needs basis.

4>4  個人的な答えI don't see how it matters either way. It'd just be nice to see people who genuinely want what is best for the country running it

4>4  個人的な答えいいえ、私たちではなく、国家の広範なベースの反汚職ウォッチドッグを確立すべきです