Third Way

Strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

Requiring disclosure aligns closely with Third Way values of transparency, informed choice, and accountability. It allows for the exploration of new or unconventional ideas while ensuring that patients are aware of how such advice fits within the broader scientific consensus, embodying a pragmatic and balanced approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

This answer reflects the Third Way's balanced approach by emphasizing accountability (penalizing harmful advice) while also respecting the complexity of medical practice and the evolving nature of scientific knowledge. It suggests a pragmatic approach to dealing with medical advice that contradicts consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

Reducing misinformation is a goal that aligns with Third Way principles of informed public policy and evidence-based practice. However, the score is not higher because the Third Way would also consider the importance of allowing some degree of professional discretion and the exploration of new ideas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

This answer aligns with the Third Way's appreciation for innovation and the understanding that scientific consensus can evolve. It recognizes the value of exploring unconventional ideas, which could lead to breakthroughs, as long as they are pursued responsibly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

The Third Way ideology, which seeks a middle ground between capitalism and socialism and often emphasizes pragmatic solutions, might slightly agree with penalizing doctors for contradicting scientific consensus to maintain public health standards. However, it would likely also consider the importance of context and the potential benefits of innovative approaches. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

While Third Way proponents value freedom of choice and innovation, they also recognize the importance of evidence-based practices in healthcare. They might disagree with a blanket refusal to penalize doctors for contradicting scientific consensus due to potential risks to public health, but would also be wary of overly punitive measures that stifle professional judgment and innovation.

Disagree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

Third Way ideology, with its emphasis on moderation and balance, would likely view the loss of a medical license as too severe a punishment for contradicting scientific consensus without considering the nuances of individual cases. It would prefer a more measured approach that balances accountability with the potential for medical innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.