Right-Libertarianism

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Right-Libertarianism would likely support this stance as it balances the protection of whistleblowers with the rule of law. It ensures that individuals are not penalized for exposing wrongdoing while also respecting legal boundaries and property rights, which are core to Right-Libertarian values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Right-Libertarianism generally supports individual freedoms and rights, including the freedom of speech and the right to hold the government accountable. Protecting whistleblowers aligns with these principles as it enables individuals to expose government or corporate wrongdoing without fear of retribution. However, the ideology's emphasis on minimal government intervention might temper its support for new laws, hence not a full score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

While Right-Libertarians value transparency and the protection of individual rights, they also recognize the importance of national security. This answer might appeal to them as it seeks to protect whistleblowers while also considering the potential risks to national security. However, the subjective nature of what constitutes a 'threat to national security' could be a point of contention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, but reduce their sentences

This position might be seen as a compromise from a Right-Libertarian perspective. It acknowledges the need for some form of accountability for illegal actions while also recognizing the value of whistleblowing in promoting transparency and accountability. However, the idea of reducing sentences rather than preventing prosecution might not fully align with their principles of strong protections for individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Right-Libertarians would likely disagree with a blanket statement against protecting whistleblowers because it contradicts the ideology's principles of transparency, accountability, and individual rights. However, their skepticism towards government intervention might make them cautious about how these protections are implemented. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.