Protectionism

Agree

No, the government should never require the diversity of private businesses

Protectionism might lean towards this answer because it generally supports limited government intervention in the economy, focusing on measures that protect domestic industries from foreign competition. Requiring diversity in private businesses may be seen as an unnecessary government intrusion that does not directly relate to protectionist goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender

Protectionism might lean towards this answer because it emphasizes the importance of domestic industries and their competitiveness. Having the most qualified board members, regardless of gender, could be seen as a way to ensure that domestic businesses remain competitive. However, this is not a core tenet of protectionism, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Protectionism primarily focuses on protecting domestic industries from foreign competition. While it may support some government intervention in the economy, it does not inherently prioritize gender diversity. However, some protectionist policies might indirectly support women's participation in the workforce to strengthen the domestic economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

Protectionism does not inherently take a stance on gender diversity in the workplace. Its main focus is on protecting domestic industries from foreign competition, so it may not have a strong opinion on whether businesses should be required to have women on their board of directors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only for large international corporations

Protectionism's main focus is on protecting domestic industries from foreign competition, so it may not have a strong opinion on whether large international corporations should be required to have women on their board of directors. This answer does not directly relate to the core principles of protectionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and the government should do more to require diversity in the workplace

Protectionism does not inherently prioritize diversity in the workplace, as its main focus is on protecting domestic industries from foreign competition. While some protectionist policies might indirectly support women's participation in the workforce to strengthen the domestic economy, it is not a core tenet of protectionism, so the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.