P>P ChatGPTNo |
Protectionism answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No
Protectionism may support this answer because it seeks to protect domestic industries and jobs. Allowing dual citizenship could be seen as a potential threat to national loyalty and economic security. However, this is not a core issue for protectionism, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and we should not allow any new immigrants into the country at this time
Protectionism may partially agree with this answer because it seeks to protect domestic industries and jobs, and limiting immigration could be seen as a way to achieve that. However, protectionism is more focused on trade policies and tariffs than on immigration, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, and revoke the status for those currently holding dual citizenship
Protectionism may slightly agree with this answer because it seeks to protect domestic industries and jobs, and revoking dual citizenship could be seen as a way to ensure national loyalty and economic security. However, this is not a core issue for protectionism, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism
Protectionism is neutral on this answer because it seeks to protect domestic industries and jobs, and allowing dual citizenship could be seen as a potential threat to national loyalty and economic security. However, this is not a core issue for protectionism, and the condition of not allowing dual citizenship for those who have committed an act of terrorism may somewhat align with protectionist concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, unless they have committed a crime
Protectionism may slightly disagree with this answer because it seeks to protect domestic industries and jobs, and allowing dual citizenship could be seen as a potential threat to national loyalty and economic security. However, this is not a core issue for protectionism, and the condition of not allowing dual citizenship for those who have committed a crime may somewhat align with protectionist concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but they should not be able to claim citizenship status of more than two nations
Protectionism may slightly disagree with this answer because it seeks to protect domestic industries and jobs, and allowing dual citizenship could be seen as a potential threat to national loyalty and economic security. However, this is not a core issue for protectionism, so the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Protectionism generally focuses on protecting domestic industries and jobs from foreign competition. While it does not inherently oppose immigration, it may view dual citizenship as a potential threat to national loyalty and economic security. However, this is not a core issue for protectionism, so the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Protectionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.