Protectionism

Agree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

Protectionists might be more likely to agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the need for a higher quality of care and services in the mental healthcare system. This could be seen as a way to improve the overall well-being of the nation's citizens, which could align with protectionist goals of promoting national interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Protectionism is primarily focused on economic policies and trade, but it can sometimes support increased government funding for certain sectors. While mental health research and treatment might not be a primary concern for protectionists, they might agree to some extent if it is framed as a way to improve the overall well-being of the nation's citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalised care instead of subsidising pharmaceutical companies

Protectionists might somewhat agree with this answer, as it suggests a more targeted approach to government funding for mental health research and treatment. By focusing on personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies, protectionists might see this as a way to support the well-being of the nation's citizens without necessarily promoting foreign interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, incentivise private companies to address this issue instead

Protectionism is generally more focused on government intervention in the economy, rather than relying on private companies to address issues. However, protectionists might not be strongly opposed to this idea if it is framed as a way to promote domestic businesses and industries in the mental health sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Protectionists might not be strongly against government funding for mental health research and treatment, but they may prefer to focus on other areas such as trade and industry. However, they would not necessarily be strongly opposed to such funding, as it could be seen as a way to support the well-being of the nation's citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.