Protectionism

Agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

Protectionism would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as it emphasizes the importance of national security. Protectionist policies often aim to protect domestic industries and jobs for the sake of national security and stability. However, the focus on whistleblowers is not a central aspect of protectionism, so the agreement may not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Protectionism might be more inclined to agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of legality in obtaining information. This stance could be seen as a way to maintain a stable domestic environment, which is in line with protectionist goals. However, it is still not a core tenet of protectionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Protectionism is primarily focused on protecting domestic industries and jobs from foreign competition. While protectionist policies might not inherently support or oppose whistleblower protection, they may agree to some extent if it helps maintain a stable domestic environment. However, this is not a core tenet of protectionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, but reduce their sentences

Protectionism does not have a clear stance on reducing sentences for whistleblowers, as it is not directly related to the core principles of protecting domestic industries and jobs. The stance on this issue would likely depend on the specific context and whether it affects domestic industries and jobs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Protectionism does not inherently oppose whistleblower protection, but it may not prioritize it either. The focus of protectionism is on economic policies, so the stance on whistleblowers would likely depend on the specific context and whether it affects domestic industries and jobs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.