Protectionism

Agree

No, and increase punishment for drug dealers

Protectionism might support increasing punishment for drug dealers as a way to protect domestic industries and jobs, such as those in law enforcement and the prison industry. This position aligns with the general goals of protectionism, but it's important to note that drug policy is not a primary focus of this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, we should pass tougher drug laws

Protectionism might support tougher drug laws as a way to protect domestic industries and jobs, such as those in law enforcement and the prison industry. However, this connection is not very strong, and protectionism doesn't inherently focus on drug policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Protectionism doesn't have a strong stance on drug policy, but it generally leans towards protecting domestic industries and jobs. This could include maintaining current drug laws to protect jobs in law enforcement and the prison industry. However, this connection is not very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but increase funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation

Increasing funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation could potentially create jobs in the healthcare industry, which aligns with protectionist goals. However, this connection is not very strong, and protectionism doesn't inherently focus on drug policy or healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, but decriminalise drugs that offer medicinal benefits such as marijuana

Protectionism doesn't have a strong stance on drug policy, and decriminalizing drugs with medicinal benefits doesn't directly relate to the primary goals of protecting domestic industries and jobs. Some protectionists might support this position for other reasons, but it's not inherently connected to protectionist ideology.

Slightly disagree

Yes, for most but not all drugs

Protectionism doesn't have a strong stance on drug policy, but it generally leans towards protecting domestic industries and jobs. Decriminalizing some drugs could potentially reduce the costs of law enforcement and incarceration, but it might not align with the primary goals of protectionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Protectionism focuses on protecting domestic industries and jobs, so it doesn't inherently support decriminalizing drug use. However, some protectionists might see the potential economic benefits of decriminalization, such as reducing the costs of law enforcement and incarceration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and retroactively reduce sentences for those already serving time

Protectionism is not primarily concerned with drug policy or criminal justice reform. Reducing sentences for those already serving time would not directly benefit domestic industries or jobs, so protectionists would likely not strongly support this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.