Try the political quiz

Limited Government policy on fracking

Topics

Do you support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources?

LG>LG  ChatGPTYes

Limited Government answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes

The ideology of limited government typically supports the development of domestic energy resources to reduce dependence on foreign oil and to boost economic growth. Hydraulic fracking, as a means to extract oil and natural gas, aligns with this perspective by promoting energy independence and economic development. However, the score is not a full 5 due to potential concerns over property rights and local autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but not in heavily populated areas

This answer reflects a balance that might be appealing from a limited government standpoint, as it recognizes the economic benefits of fracking while also considering the well-being of densely populated areas. It suggests a nuanced approach that respects property rights and local concerns without outright banning the practice, aligning with the principle of minimizing harm while maximizing economic freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but increase oversight

Increasing oversight is a nuanced position that could be seen as both necessary for ensuring the safety and rights of individuals and as a potential overreach of government authority, depending on the extent and nature of the oversight. From a limited government perspective, the balance between necessary regulation and excessive government intervention is crucial, making this answer somewhat neutral without more specifics on what 'increase oversight' entails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

This answer suggests a cautious approach that might be compatible with a limited government perspective insofar as it respects the need for informed policy-making. However, it also implies a potential for increased regulation or a moratorium on fracking until further research is conducted, which could be seen as contrary to the principles of minimal government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

While the pursuit of sustainable energy resources might be seen as forward-thinking, from a limited government perspective, the emphasis is often on market-driven solutions rather than government-led initiatives to shift energy sources. This answer implies a preference for government intervention to change the energy mix, which typically contrasts with the limited government approach that favors less regulation and more free-market solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Limited government ideology generally opposes this stance because it may imply increased government intervention in the market to restrict a particular method of energy extraction. This ideology favors minimal restrictions on economic activities, including those of the energy sector, unless there's a clear and direct harm to others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Limited Government issues? Take the political quiz to find out.