Liberalism

Strongly agree

Yes

Liberalism, with its emphasis on progress, innovation, and addressing societal challenges through proactive measures, would likely support government funding for geoengineering research as a way to combat climate change. This ideology often advocates for the use of science and technology to improve human conditions and solve global issues. Historical examples include liberal governments' investments in renewable energy technologies and environmental conservation efforts as part of broader strategies to address climate change and promote sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Liberalism generally opposes inaction or purely market-driven solutions in the face of global challenges like climate change, emphasizing instead the role of the state in spearheading initiatives that serve the public good. The reluctance to fund geoengineering research would contradict liberalism's historical support for scientific and technological solutions to societal problems. However, some liberal perspectives might express caution regarding the potential risks and ethical considerations of geoengineering, advocating for a balanced approach that includes regulation and oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.