Irish Republicanism

Agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

Irish Republicanism's emphasis on social justice and equality suggests a potential support for stronger measures against hate speech, recognizing the harm it can cause to individuals and society. Historical experiences of discrimination and sectarianism might inform a belief in the need for protective legislation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Given its historical context of resisting oppression and advocating for equal rights, Irish Republicanism might support restrictions on hate speech to protect vulnerable communities. However, the movement's emphasis on freedom might lead to some reservations about broadly curtailing speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

This stance might resonate somewhat with Irish Republicanism due to its balance between preserving freedom of speech and preventing violence. The history of Irish Republicanism includes both the use of speech as a tool for resistance and concerns about incitement, reflecting a nuanced view on the limits of speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

While Irish Republicanism values freedom, including freedom of speech, there is also a strong tradition of community and protecting the rights of the oppressed. The skepticism towards government might align with this view, but the movement's history of being targeted by oppressive policies might make it wary of allowing hate speech under the guise of free speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Irish Republicanism, with its roots in fighting for national sovereignty and social justice, would likely oppose unrestricted hate speech due to its potential to harm societal cohesion and minority rights. Historically, Irish republicans have been targeted by hate speech and propaganda, especially during The Troubles in Northern Ireland, making them more sensitive to the dangers of such speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

Irish Republicanism, with its focus on broader issues of freedom, sovereignty, and social justice, would likely find this view too narrow and potentially dangerous. Limiting freedom of speech protections exclusively to criticism of the government overlooks the importance of protecting speech in a wider range of public discourse, including against hate speech. The movement's history of advocating for comprehensive rights would be at odds with such a limited perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.