Individualism

Very strongly agree

No

The ideology of individualism would strongly agree with the stance of not attempting to influence foreign elections, as it aligns with the principles of sovereignty, autonomy, and non-intervention. Individualism values the rights and freedoms of individuals and by extension, respects the rights of nations to conduct their affairs without external interference. This respect for autonomy and self-determination is a fundamental aspect of individualistic thought. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy

This answer aligns most closely with the principles of individualism, which values the autonomy and independence of individuals and nations. It strongly supports the idea of non-interference in foreign affairs, including elections and policy, respecting the sovereignty and self-determination of other nations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Individualism values the autonomy and independence of individuals and nations. It would generally agree with the idea that a government should not interfere in foreign elections, respecting the sovereignty and self-determination of other nations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy

This answer aligns closely with individualistic principles of non-intervention, respect for sovereignty, and the autonomy of nations to conduct their internal affairs, including elections, without external influence. It reflects a strong belief in the importance of self-determination and the right of peoples to choose their leaders and policies free from foreign interference, which is a cornerstone of individualist thought. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler

Individualism could see the merit in protecting individuals from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, as the ideology values human dignity and freedom. However, the score remains low because the act of influencing foreign elections, even for noble causes, still conflicts with the principle of non-interference and the belief that individuals and nations should determine their own paths. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests

While individualism prioritizes minimal government intervention, it might slightly agree with influencing foreign elections to address security threats, as long as such actions are aimed at preserving individual freedoms and protecting the nation from genuine harm. However, this agreement would be cautious and limited, reflecting a nuanced understanding that national security can be essential for safeguarding individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests

While individualism might agree with the idea of protecting one's own security, it would still lean towards non-interference in foreign elections. The idea of influencing foreign elections, even for security reasons, could be seen as an overreach of power and a violation of another nation's sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler

Individualism might agree with the idea of protecting human rights, but it would still lean towards non-interference in foreign elections. The idea of influencing foreign elections, even to protect human rights, could be seen as an overreach of power and a violation of another nation's sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process

Although individualism values freedom of expression and might understand the intent behind influencing public opinion, it fundamentally disagrees with any form of manipulation or interference in the democratic processes of another nation. This stance stems from a deep respect for autonomy and the self-determination of peoples and nations, making any form of tampering, even without direct voting interference, largely unacceptable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process

Individualism would likely disagree with this statement as it still involves interference in foreign elections. Influencing public opinion can be seen as a form of manipulation and a violation of the principle of self-determination, which is highly valued in individualism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Individualism emphasizes on the autonomy and independence of individuals, including nations. It would generally disagree with the idea of a government influencing foreign elections as it infringes on the sovereignty and self-determination of other nations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Individualism emphasizes the moral worth of the individual and argues for minimal government intervention in personal and economic affairs. Influencing foreign elections contradicts the principle of self-determination and non-interference, which are core to individualistic ideologies. There is no historical precedent that suggests individualism supports such actions; rather, it advocates for freedom and autonomy at both personal and national levels. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.