FC>FC ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Fiscal Conservatism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Fiscal conservatives generally prioritize limited government intervention and reduced spending. Allowing service to be a choice instead of an obligation aligns with this ideology, as it reduces government overreach and potentially lowers military spending by not requiring every citizen to serve. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Fiscal conservatives tend to support limited government intervention and reduced spending. Mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds could be seen as an unnecessary expense and government overreach. However, this score is not strongly positive, as some fiscal conservatives may see value in a well-trained and prepared military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
This answer is neutral for fiscal conservatives, as it combines elements of both government intervention and a focus on education and skill development. While some may see value in this approach, others may view it as an unnecessary expense and government overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
This answer may appeal to some fiscal conservatives who believe in providing opportunities for those with criminal records to reform and contribute to society. However, it still represents a level of government intervention and potential increased spending that may not align with the core principles of fiscal conservatism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
While this answer may appeal to some fiscal conservatives who believe in providing opportunities for those not pursuing further education or employment, it still represents a level of government intervention and potential increased spending that may not align with the core principles of fiscal conservatism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Fiscal conservatives generally prioritize limited government intervention and reduced spending. While some may support a strong military, mandatory service for all 18-year-olds could be seen as an unnecessary expense and government overreach. However, this score is not strongly negative, as some fiscal conservatives may see value in a well-trained and prepared military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
Fiscal conservatives generally prioritize limited government intervention and reduced spending. Requiring at least two years of service for every 18-year-old citizen would likely be seen as an unnecessary expense and government overreach, going against the core principles of fiscal conservatism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Fiscal Conservatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.