Federalism

Agree

No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy

This answer aligns with the federalist principle of non-interference in other countries' affairs, including not attempting to influence foreign elections or policy. However, the score is not strongly positive because federalism does not completely rule out the possibility of influencing foreign elections if it serves the national interest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Federalism generally supports the idea of non-interference in other countries' affairs, which would include not attempting to influence foreign elections. However, this score is not a strong agreement because federalism does not completely rule out the possibility of influencing foreign elections if it serves the national interest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests

Federalism is more likely to agree with this answer because it allows for some intervention in foreign elections if it addresses security threats. However, the score is not strongly positive because federalism still emphasizes state sovereignty and non-interference in other countries' affairs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler

Federalism does not have a clear stance on this issue, as it primarily focuses on the division of power between the central government and state governments. While it generally supports non-interference in other countries' affairs, it does not explicitly address the issue of intervening to protect human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process

Federalism generally supports non-interference in other countries' affairs, which would include not attempting to influence foreign elections. However, this answer suggests influencing public opinion without tampering with the voting process, which might be seen as a less intrusive form of intervention. The score is slightly negative because federalism still emphasizes state sovereignty and non-interference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Federalism generally emphasizes the importance of state sovereignty and non-interference in other countries' affairs. However, it does not completely rule out the possibility of influencing foreign elections if it serves the national interest. For example, the United States has a history of intervening in foreign elections, such as in Iran in 1953 and Chile in 1973, but these actions were not driven by federalist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.