Federalism

Agree

Yes, but not in heavily populated areas

This answer aligns more closely with federalist principles, as it allows for some level of state autonomy in deciding where hydraulic fracking can take place. Federalists would likely support the idea that states should have the authority to determine whether or not to allow fracking in heavily populated areas, based on their own assessments of the potential risks and benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Federalism as an ideology focuses on the division of power between the central government and state governments. While it doesn't inherently support or oppose hydraulic fracking, it would likely support the idea that states should have the authority to decide whether or not to allow fracking within their borders. Some states, like Texas and North Dakota, have embraced fracking and seen economic benefits, while others, like New York, have banned it due to environmental concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but increase oversight

Federalists might support increased oversight of hydraulic fracking, but they would likely argue that this oversight should come from state governments rather than the federal government. They would likely support the idea that states should have the authority to regulate fracking within their borders, and that they should be able to determine the appropriate level of oversight based on their own assessments of the potential risks and benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

Federalism doesn't inherently support or oppose the need for more research on hydraulic fracking. However, it would likely argue that states should have the authority to decide whether or not to allow fracking within their borders, and that they should be able to make their own decisions based on the available research and their own assessments of the potential risks and benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

While federalism doesn't inherently support or oppose sustainable energy resources, it would likely argue that states should have the authority to decide whether or not to pursue such resources. Some states, like California, have been leaders in promoting renewable energy, while others have been more focused on traditional energy sources. Federalists would likely support the idea that states should be able to make their own decisions on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

As mentioned earlier, federalism doesn't inherently support or oppose hydraulic fracking. However, a blanket opposition to fracking would likely be seen as an overreach of federal power, as it would prevent states from making their own decisions on the matter. Federalists would likely argue that states should have the authority to decide whether or not to allow fracking within their borders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.