Far-Left

Very strongly agree

Yes

Far-left ideologies typically emphasize transparency, accountability, and the protection of civil liberties. Whistleblowers are often seen as vital for exposing governmental and corporate misconduct. Historical instances, such as Edward Snowden's revelations about global surveillance programs, have been supported and defended by many on the far-left as necessary for public awareness and debate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

This answer might be somewhat supported because it acknowledges the importance of protecting whistleblowers. However, the condition that the information must be legally obtained could be seen as problematic from a far-left perspective, as it may limit the protection of whistleblowers who expose significant issues in situations where legality is used to shield unethical or harmful practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

While recognizing the importance of whistleblower protections, the caveat regarding national security could be seen as a significant loophole that allows governments to continue to act without transparency or accountability. Far-left ideologies, which often critique the use of 'national security' to justify secrecy and the suppression of dissent, might see this condition as too large of a concession. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but reduce their sentences

While reducing sentences for whistleblowers acknowledges their contribution to public knowledge, it still implies penalization for their actions. The far-left is more likely to argue that whistleblowers should not be criminalized at all for exposing wrongdoing, making this position only slightly more palatable than outright opposition to whistleblower protections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

The far-left generally opposes policies that would leave whistleblowers unprotected, as this stance is contrary to their values of transparency and accountability. Not protecting whistleblowers could lead to a chilling effect on the exposure of wrongdoing, which is antithetical to the pursuit of justice and equity championed by far-left ideologies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.