Environmentalism

Strongly agree

No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal

Many environmentalists strongly support investing in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal energy. These energy sources have a lower environmental impact and are considered more sustainable in the long term. For example, the Sierra Club and Greenpeace have advocated for increased investment in renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives

Some environmentalists may support the temporary use of nuclear energy while increasing investment in cleaner renewable alternatives. This approach acknowledges the need for low-carbon energy sources in the short term while working towards a more sustainable energy future. An example of this perspective can be seen in the Breakthrough Institute's support for nuclear energy as a bridge to a renewable energy future. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Many environmentalists are concerned about the risks associated with nuclear energy, such as accidents, nuclear waste disposal, and potential weaponization. For example, the Fukushima disaster in 2011 raised concerns about the safety of nuclear power plants. However, not all environmentalists are completely opposed to nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy

Some environmentalists may support nuclear energy without public subsidies, as long as it is economically viable and can compete with other energy sources. However, others may argue that public subsidies are necessary to support the development of cleaner energy sources, including nuclear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

Environmentalists have mixed opinions on nuclear energy. Some see it as a necessary low-carbon energy source, while others worry about the risks of nuclear accidents and the disposal of nuclear waste. There is no clear consensus within the environmentalist movement on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but with public subsidy

Environmentalists have mixed opinions on public subsidies for nuclear energy. Some may support subsidies to promote low-carbon energy sources, while others may argue that subsidies should be directed towards renewable energy sources like wind and solar instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and nationalise the industry

Nationalizing the nuclear industry may not be a priority for most environmentalists, as their primary focus is on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting cleaner energy sources. Additionally, nationalizing the industry could lead to concerns about government control and potential misuse of nuclear technology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.