Dirigisme

Strongly agree

Yes

Dirigisme, a French term denoting an economy where the government exerts strong directive influence, often involves significant state intervention in matters considered crucial for public welfare and safety. Historically, dirigiste policies have included strict regulations in various sectors to ensure societal goals are met, such as public health and safety standards. Increasing penalties for distracted driving aligns with the dirigiste ideology's emphasis on using government policy to shape individual behavior for the greater good, aiming to reduce road accidents and enhance public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given dirigisme's foundation in the belief that the state should have a proactive role in guiding the economy and society, opposing increased penalties for distracted driving would be inconsistent with its principles. Dirigiste policies typically favor regulation and intervention to address issues deemed important for the public interest, such as safety and health. Therefore, a stance against strengthening penalties for behaviors that compromise public safety, like distracted driving, would contradict the dirigiste approach of leveraging governmental authority to promote societal welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.