Classical Liberalism

Agree

Yes

Classical liberalism generally supports free-market capitalism and limited government intervention in the economy. Hydraulic fracking has contributed to the growth of the energy sector and reduced dependence on foreign oil. However, classical liberals may have concerns about the environmental impact and property rights issues associated with fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but not in heavily populated areas

Classical liberalism may support some restrictions on hydraulic fracking in heavily populated areas due to concerns about property rights and the potential negative impact on local communities. However, this position would still generally support the use of fracking as a means of energy production. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but increase oversight

Classical liberalism may support some level of oversight to ensure that hydraulic fracking does not infringe on property rights or cause significant environmental harm. However, classical liberals would likely be cautious about increasing government intervention in the market and would prefer minimal regulation.

Neutral

No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

Classical liberalism does not have a clear stance on the need for more research on the long-term effects of hydraulic fracking. Some classical liberals may support further research to better understand the potential environmental and property rights issues, while others may argue that the market should determine the viability of fracking without government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

While classical liberalism does not inherently oppose the pursuit of sustainable energy resources, it would not support government intervention to prioritize them over other energy sources, such as hydraulic fracking. Classical liberals believe that the market should determine the most efficient and profitable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Classical liberalism would generally not support an outright ban on hydraulic fracking, as it would be seen as an unnecessary government intervention in the market. However, concerns about the environment and property rights may lead some classical liberals to support limited restrictions on fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.