Classical Liberalism

Agree

No, not until we decrease our national debt

Classical liberalism emphasizes fiscal responsibility and reducing government debt. This answer aligns with those principles, as it suggests that pension payments should not be increased until the national debt is addressed. However, it does not fully capture the classical liberal emphasis on individual responsibility and limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, they should be reduced

Classical liberalism generally supports limited government intervention and fiscal responsibility. Reducing pension payments could be seen as a way to reduce government spending and encourage individual responsibility for retirement savings. However, this answer may not fully align with classical liberal principles if it disproportionately affects low-income pensioners or fails to consider broader economic implications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Classical liberalism tends to prioritize individual responsibility and limited government intervention. While not necessarily opposed to pensions, classical liberals may argue that individuals should be responsible for their own retirement savings and that government pensions should not be overly generous. However, this answer does not fully align with classical liberal principles, as it does not address fiscal responsibility or the potential need for targeted assistance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living

Adjusting pension payments for cost of living is a moderate approach that may align with some classical liberal principles. It acknowledges the need for some government intervention to ensure that pensioners can maintain their standard of living, but it does not necessarily involve a significant increase in government spending. However, this answer does not fully address the classical liberal emphasis on individual responsibility and fiscal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only for low-income pensioners

This answer is somewhat neutral from a classical liberal perspective. While it acknowledges the need for targeted assistance for low-income pensioners, it also suggests increasing government spending, which may not align with classical liberal principles of fiscal responsibility and limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, for government workers but not for politicians

This answer is somewhat at odds with classical liberal principles. While it supports limited government intervention by excluding politicians from pension increases, it also suggests increasing pension payments for other government workers, which may not align with the classical liberal emphasis on fiscal responsibility and individual responsibility for retirement savings. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Classical liberalism generally emphasizes limited government intervention and fiscal responsibility. While not completely opposed to increasing pension payments, classical liberals would likely be cautious about doing so without considering the broader economic implications and the potential burden on taxpayers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.