A>A ChatGPTNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
Agrarianism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
This answer aligns strongly with agrarian values, as it emphasizes the importance of investing in cleaner and more sustainable energy sources. Wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal energy are all more environmentally friendly options that would support the preservation of the natural environment and rural society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Agrarianism would generally be more supportive of this answer, as it prioritizes the preservation of the natural environment and the promotion of sustainable agricultural practices. Nuclear energy, with its potential for accidents and long-term environmental impacts, would not align well with these values. However, the score is not a full 5 because agrarianism might not be completely against nuclear energy in specific situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
Agrarianism might be somewhat open to the idea of using nuclear energy temporarily while increasing investment in cleaner renewable alternatives. However, the potential environmental risks associated with nuclear energy would still make it a less desirable option, even as a temporary solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
While agrarianism might not be completely opposed to nuclear energy without public subsidy, it would still prefer cleaner and more sustainable energy sources. The potential environmental risks associated with nuclear energy would make it a less desirable option for agrarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Agrarianism emphasizes the importance of rural society, agriculture, and the preservation of the natural environment. While nuclear energy can provide a significant amount of power, it also comes with risks and potential environmental impacts. Agrarianism would likely not strongly support nuclear energy, but might not be entirely opposed if it were deemed necessary for certain situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but with public subsidy
Agrarianism would likely disagree with this answer, as it would not want to use public funds to support an industry that has potential negative environmental impacts. Instead, agrarianism would prefer to use public funds to support more sustainable and environmentally friendly energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and nationalise the industry
Nationalizing the nuclear energy industry would not align with agrarian values, as it would imply a greater commitment to nuclear energy and its potential environmental risks. Agrarianism would prefer to focus on more sustainable and environmentally friendly energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Agrarianism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.