Proponents argue that it would preserve cultural heritage and appeal to those who value traditional designs. Opponents argue that it would stifle innovation and limit the design freedom of car manufacturers.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
State
Response rates from 775 Australia voters.
15% Yes |
85% No |
15% Yes |
85% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 775 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 775 Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B46SKB62wks2W
No, this is foolish, cars should be safe and able to get someone from place A to B, not have an "aesthetic"
@B32RT3F2mos2MO
No, there is no reason to regulate something that is more an issue of personal taste.
@B2SXP9S2mos2MO
No, aesthetic is a matter of personal taste and is not a government matter.
@B2M35XB 2mos2MO
No, but it would be appreciated if newer vehicles did.
@B2GPGNC3mos3MO
No, but there must be encouragement of preserving classic aesthetics among modern vehicles that can do the same job.
@B33YFNS2mos2MO
All new vehicles should meet safety requirements and pass inspection for road safety.
@9YLJ57B5mos5MO
No, but vehicle design should be regulated for safety reasons
Join in on the most popular conversations.
