Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party

Strongly agree

No

Given their general support for individual economic freedom and property rights, the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party would likely oppose a ban on negative gearing. This is because such a ban could be seen as a restriction on the ability of property owners to manage their investments as they see fit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but limit to one house per person

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party might be more open to this compromise position, as it would limit the impact of negative gearing without banning it outright. However, they would likely still have concerns about any restrictions on property rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, the government will save over $4 billion per year in lost taxes

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party might acknowledge the potential for government savings from banning negative gearing, but they would likely argue that the potential negative impacts on property owners and the housing market outweigh these savings. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this concession disproportionately benefits the rich

While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party may agree that negative gearing can disproportionately benefit the rich, they would likely argue that the solution is not to ban it outright, but to implement other measures to address wealth inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party generally supports policies that promote individual economic freedom and oppose restrictions on property rights. They have not explicitly stated their position on negative gearing, but their general stance would likely lead them to oppose a ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.