@B4BPF7T1wk1W
No, but prevent it in Australian waters and use diplomacy to discourage Japanese whaling. While we may not approve of it, we can't risk our relationship with a close ally.
@B3TZ7VF4wks4W
No, just prohibit it in Australian waters and take a diplomatic approach to discourage it. It would be improper to act with aggression against a key ally.
@B3QHXY31mo1MO
Yes, but encourage the ending of commercial whaling- simply protecting whales in Australia's waters is not effective- whales are migratory and travel through international waters for breeding season, so the whales that travel Australia's coastline would remain under threat. Perhaps we could extend the pressure of a ban to be from Australia to Antarctica, which encompasses a large part of multiple species' migration, and is an important route for whales.
Japanese traditional whale hunting practices however should be allowed to continue if sustainable.
just prevent Japanese whaling in Australian waters and try to take a diplomatic approach to discourage Japanese whaling
No, just prevent whaling in Australian waters and undertake diplomatic approaches to discourage Japanese whaling. It may not be consistent with our values, but we shouldn't overly inflame relations with an ally we hold in high regard.
@B2SXP9S2mos2MO
No, but prohibit it in Australian waters and take diplomatic efforts. It may be immoral, but we should not act with aggression against citizens of a steadfast ally.
Yes, but only if they enter Australian waters and also try to diplomatically discourage Japanese whaling.
@9TKSK4D7mos7MO
Yes, take a tough active stances on all excessive fishing within Continental Australia and Australian territory waters
@92DPRNZ3yrs3Y
I don't agree with whaling but we can't be telling other cultures what to do when we still let our native people kill endangered animals like sea turtles and dugongs... So no.
@9HCXTZW1yr1Y
Not exactly, but prevent whaling in Australian waters, and take a diplomatic approach to discourage whaling.
@8TQ7D3L4yrs4Y
The Australian government taking aggressive stances on other countries' environmental damage is deeply hypocritical given its track record, especially in the oceans
@8TD2MXG4yrs4Y
No, but make them pay taxes in our waters.
@8D2H6GM5yrs5Y
Compromise with the Japanese dudes. It’s not hard.
I need to know how serious this issue is
@92VPTG93yrs3Y
An active stance should be taken but not in a aggressive manner
Yes, when it violates our own waters, and we should work diplomatically with other nations to find alternatives to current natural and living resource depletion
@98YDX2R2yrs2Y
Yes, however, the "aggressiveness" shouldn't be taking military actions, or shooting the Japanese Whalers.
Support more humane methods and a cap on the number based on observed populations and limit impacts on breeding Cycles
@9326HZV3yrs3Y
Take an active stance specifically against commercial whaling. Traditional hunting practices are not equivalent to commercially hunting endangered species to near extinction
@92WGVZH3yrs3Y
This shouldn’t be simply an Australian issue, this is global issue. We must do what we can with our resources and not exert those
Yes, if it is creating a large pollution issue or putting any creatures on a possible extinction watchlist
@92DKHTJLiberal Democrat3yrs3Y
we have Isolationism Full-Bore non-stop.
@8GQNTRS5yrs5Y
Discourage whaling in general.
@8RM3D294yrs4Y
Allow certain species of whales to be harvested
@GYWYJ74yrs4Y
Develop sustainable whaling to reduce the current decimation of tuna stocks.
@GZLBYB4yrs4Y
Enforce whaling only in Japanese waters. Assist the Japanese in a sustainability program.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.